Technology and Sovereignty in the Arctic series Part 2:

Digital Sovereignty on Northern Terms

These reflections are shared from the perspective of a Northern-based technology partner. We do not speak on behalf of First Nations or claim expertise in Indigenous data governance. Our intent is only to acknowledge its importance and to defer to the leadership, knowledge, and priorities of the Nations themselves.

In our first post in this series, we talked about how technology has become inseparable from sovereignty in the Arctic.

Before discussing technology specifics, we have to acknowledge the foundational starting point.

Digital sovereignty in the Yukon is inseparable from First Nations data sovereignty.

The Council of Yukon First Nations Data Governance Strategy describes a vision where all First Nations have full sovereignty over their data and knowledge, how it is collected, where it is stored, and how it is analyzed and communicated. That vision builds directly on principles first articulated more than 50 years ago in Together Today for Our Children Tomorrow.

For Yukon First Nations, governance of data is a core element of nationhood.

That includes, but is not limited to:

  • Citizen and membership records
  • Land and resource data
  • Cultural knowledge and history
  • Health and wellness information
  • Information created by and for their governments and communities

These kinds of information are not just files and databases. They represent people, history, land, and community. Because of that, technology systems are never neutral. They are frameworks that can support Indigenous self determination while also, by their very design, introducing structures and assumptions that may conflict with it.

Digital Sovereignty on Northern Terms

One of the most powerful ideas in Northern discussions of digital sovereignty is the concept of data on the land.

The principle is that information about a Nation, its citizens, and its territory should ideally be stored and governed within that territory, and under the control of that Nation.

As a value, this resonates deeply. The idea that data about a Nation should be governed on its own land reflects a desire for control, autonomy, and self determination.

But as a practical reality, the concept raises difficult questions.

  • How does data on the land fit within digital systems that are designed around global workflows, standards, and assumptions?
  • Should locally stored data still be backed up elsewhere to protect it from loss or disruption?
  • How do we ensure both local control and long term security at the same time?

These are not arguments against the principle, but honest reflections on the complexity of living it.

The challenge is to find approaches that respect the intent of data on the land while also acknowledging the technical and operational realities of modern digital systems.

Where Northern Data Lives

Most Northern generated data does not live in the North.

It is hosted on national and international platforms, stored in data centers far outside the territory, and managed by organizations governed under other jurisdictions.

Increasingly, it is also processed by external analytics tools and artificial intelligence systems that collect, aggregate, and learn from information created in Northern communities, often in ways that are difficult to trace or control.

This reality raises important questions:

  • Who controls the platforms and models that process Northern data?
  • Who has access to it, and for what purposes?
  • Under what laws and jurisdictions does it operate?
  • How is it being used to train systems that may ultimately be owned and operated elsewhere?

These questions highlight that sovereignty is not only about where data is stored.

Understanding digital sovereignty means also looking beyond physical location alone as a principle, and considering how data is analyzed, reused, and transformed once it leaves the territory.

Practical Paths Forward

What do First Nations governments, public sector organizations, and Northern communities actually do about this?

Most operate within a mixed digital environment. Some systems are hosted locally, some rely on national or international platforms, and many use a combination of both. Every choice involves tradeoffs between cost, security, control, and long term sustainability.

In practice, responsible approaches could include:

  • Hybrid hosting strategies that keep the most sensitive data closer to home
  • Clear agreements about data ownership and access for third party platforms and tools
  • Governance frameworks that define how data and artificial intelligence systems can be used
  • Local backups and redundancy where feasible

A Broader View

These questions span the Arctic.

Territorial governments, public institutions, and Northern communities are all navigating how to adopt modern technology without losing local control or local context. The shared challenge is to benefit from new tools and external expertise while ensuring that digital systems ultimately reflect Northern priorities and the intent of sovereignty in a modern world.

From our perspective as a Yukon-headquartered technology partner, the most important step is to keep these choices grounded in local leadership and local decision making. How the North approaches that balance will shape not only the future of technology here, but the future of sovereignty itself.

Up Next: Building Northern Digital Capacity

In the finale, Part III of this series, we will shift to looking at why local skills, local companies, and local leadership are essential to turning digital sovereignty from an idea into a long term reality.

Don’t Miss an Update

Join our mailing list to receive fresh insights, stories and updates.